<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Carless in Chicago &#187; parking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carlessinchicago.com/tag/parking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carlessinchicago.com</link>
	<description>Live and Thrive in Chicago Without a Car</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 21:10:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Economics of Parking</title>
		<link>http://www.carlessinchicago.com/2010/08/25/economics-of-parking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.carlessinchicago.com/2010/08/25/economics-of-parking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 22:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy & Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transit economics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carlessinchicago.com/?p=264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In the book, I briefly mention Donald Schoup&#8217;s excellent book, The High Price of Free Parking, but I don&#8217;t go into great detail about how changing the way we price parking might improve our quality of life. As it happens, a couple weeks ago, economist Tyler Cowen wrote a great Op-Ed about this very [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the book, I briefly mention Donald Schoup&#8217;s excellent book, The High Price of Free Parking, but I don&#8217;t go into great detail about how changing the way we price parking might improve our quality of life. As it happens, a couple weeks ago, economist Tyler Cowen wrote a great Op-Ed about this very topic, which also led to some interesting follow-up debate. One advantage of being a slightly lazy blogger is that I can list all of these discussions together in a comprehensive post.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/15/business/economy/15view.html" target="_blank">Free Parking Comes at a Price</a> by Tyler Cowen.</p>
<p>Arnold Kling <a href="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2010/08/why_is_there_fr.html" target="_blank">responds</a>, and Cowen <a href="http://www.marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2010/08/kling-on-free-parking.html" target="_blank">responds back</a>.</p>
<p>Robin Hanson <a href="http://www.overcomingbias.com/2010/08/against-free-parking.html" target="_blank">responds to both</a>, and Kling <a href="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2010/08/parking_what_is.html" target="_blank">replies</a>.</p>
<p>On a roll, Cowen also provides a little more &#8216;color commentary&#8217; <a href="http://www.marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2010/08/more-parking-links.html" target="_blank">here</a> and <a href="http://www.marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2010/08/parking-fact-of-the-day.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>Of course, here in Chicago we&#8217;re living through the great parking meter privatization experiment. Aaron Renn (the <a href="http://www.urbanophile.com/" target="_blank">Urbanophile</a>) provides <a href="http://www.urbanophile.com/2010/08/22/parking-meters-and-the-perils-of-privatization/" target="_blank">some excellent commentary</a>, focusing largely on how Chicago&#8217;s parking meter deal locks the city into a pretty inflexible model for parking policy.</p>
<p>For the moment, I&#8217;ll spare readers my own entirely correct but quite unpopular opinions about what Chicago should be doing differently parking-wise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carlessinchicago.com/2010/08/25/economics-of-parking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LaHood Profile</title>
		<link>http://www.carlessinchicago.com/2009/06/18/lahood-profile/</link>
		<comments>http://www.carlessinchicago.com/2009/06/18/lahood-profile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 03:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carlessinchicago.com/?p=63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In case you missed it, current Transportation Secretary (and former congressman from IL-18) Ray LaHood got the Deborah Solomon treatment in last week&#8217;s New York Times Magazine. The interview is fairly broad but not very deep, but still gives some notion of the administrations priorities when it comes to livable communities. But although I&#8217;ve [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you missed it, current Transportation Secretary (and former congressman from IL-18) Ray LaHood <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/14/magazine/14FOB-q4-t.html">got the Deborah Solomon treatment in last week&#8217;s New York Times Magazine</a>. The interview is fairly broad but not very deep, but still gives some notion of the administrations priorities when it comes to livable communities. But although I&#8217;ve been relatively happy with a lot of LaHood&#8217;s statements (particularly on high speed rail), I have to take issue with this nugget from the interview:</p>
<blockquote><p>I think everybody will have an automobile. I think it’s amazing in America when you drive around and look at new homes that are being built, there are three-car garages. I don’t think you’re going to see families with three cars. I think you’re going to see families with one car, possibly two.</p></blockquote>
<p>As I say more than once in the text, <em>Carless in Chicago</em> is not an anti-car book. And I accept that not everyone lives in as dense an environment as Chicago, and that in some parts of Chicagoland, people will rely on cars for primary transportation. But I think LaHood&#8217;s comment reflects one of the real limitations to the ways in which government analyzes problems. For example, here in Chicago, we have a terrible parking shortage, which has resulted in laws and regulations to encourage the creation of new parking. (This itself is a terrible policy, for reasons explored in Donald Shoup&#8217;s <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1884829988?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=carlinchic-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=1884829988" target="_blank"><em>The High Cost of Free Parking</em></a>.)  We fail to examine the problem from the perspective that there may simply be more cars in the city than we can responsibly keep, and rarely examine policies to lessen the parking shortage by reducing their numbers.</p>
<p>To be fair, I should point out that my viewpoint may have some unlikely allies. <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2000/nov/12/theobserver.observerbusiness7" target="_blank">Way back in 2000 during his first stint as Ford&#8217;s CEO, Bill Ford, Jr. said</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The day will come when the notion of car ownership becomes antiquated. If you live in a city, you don&#8217;t need to own a car.</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s the kind of private sector leadership I can get behind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carlessinchicago.com/2009/06/18/lahood-profile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
