<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Carless in Chicago &#187; stimulus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carlessinchicago.com/tag/stimulus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carlessinchicago.com</link>
	<description>Live and Thrive in Chicago Without a Car</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 21:10:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Speaking of CTA and other transit funding&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.carlessinchicago.com/2010/07/22/speaking-of-cta-and-other-transit-funding/</link>
		<comments>http://www.carlessinchicago.com/2010/07/22/speaking-of-cta-and-other-transit-funding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Springfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carlessinchicago.com/?p=245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I feel negligent in not mentioning sooner that for those interested in transit funding (and that should be just about anyone interested in Carless in Chicago), Greg Hinz over at Crain&#8217;s has been doing a great job covering the latest developments down in Springfield. In his latest blog post, he mentions a topic that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel negligent in not mentioning sooner that for those interested in transit funding (and that should be just about anyone interested in <em>Carless in Chicago</em>), <a href="http://www.chicagobusiness.com/cgi-bin/blogs/hinz.pl" target="_blank">Greg Hinz over at Crain&#8217;s</a> has been doing a great job covering the latest developments down in Springfield. In his latest blog post, he mentions a topic that seems to be dear to his heart (and to mine): <a href="http://www.chicagobusiness.com/cgi-bin/blogs/hinz.pl?plckController=Blog&amp;plckScript=blogScript&amp;plckElementId=blogDest&amp;plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&amp;plckPostId=Blog:1daca073-2eab-468e-9f19-ec177090a35cPost:96b89189-19c0-4b0b-b526-e37958a54e40&amp;sid=sitelife.chicagobusiness.com" target="_blank">the quick funding or road projects versus the glacial funding of mass transit projects</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carlessinchicago.com/2010/07/22/speaking-of-cta-and-other-transit-funding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medium Speed Rail</title>
		<link>http://www.carlessinchicago.com/2009/07/31/medium-speed-rail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.carlessinchicago.com/2009/07/31/medium-speed-rail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy & Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transit economics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carlessinchicago.com/?p=173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I am unashamed of my desire to see new high speed rail links brought to the Chicago region and elsewhere. But recently, two commentators have reminded us that as exciting as HSR projects would be, they may not really represent our most pressing transit needs.</p> <p>Just today, John McCarron pens a Tribune Op-Ed arguing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am unashamed of my desire to see new high speed rail links brought to the Chicago region and elsewhere. But recently, two commentators have reminded us that as exciting as HSR projects would be, they may not really represent our most pressing transit needs.</p>
<p>Just today, John McCarron pens a Tribune Op-Ed arguing that <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chi-oped0727mccarronjul27,0,4748777.story" target="_blank">putting stimulus dollars into what he refers to as &#8220;medium speed rail&#8221; like the El and Metra systems would benefit a lot of people a lot more quickly</a> that many of the projects that congress is currently evaluating.</p>
<p>Writing a little more broadly, Ben Adler of The Nation points out that <a href="http://www.thenation.com/doc/20090803/adler" target="_blank">most of the public transit dollars in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act go to new projects, rather than providing much needed operating support to local agencies</a>.</p>
<p>I think anyone who&#8217;s lived through the numerous &#8220;doomsday&#8221; scenarios of the past few years would have hard time arguing with these points. I&#8217;d speculate that we&#8217;re likely to see another stimulus bill in some shape or form in the next twelve months. If you&#8217;re inclined to do so, consider <a href="http://www.votesmart.org/" target="_blank">writing your representatives</a> to let them know your priorities as a carless citizen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carlessinchicago.com/2009/07/31/medium-speed-rail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
